Professor Citachka · Department
Philosophy
A clear route, built for real understanding
Your guided study path
Move through sections → levels → units → lessons. Each lesson is deliberately longer than a drill: it explains the idea, works through an example, gives you optional retrieval practice, and then saves your reading. Unit quizzes and level assessments come after the teaching—not every two minutes, because we are building knowledge, not training a very anxious button-pusher.
Your progress path
Units, one crown at a time
Each unit is five lessons. Read every lesson in a unit and it earns a crown. The next unit opens when you reach it, so the path always shows exactly where you are.
- —day streak
- —of 20 unit crowns
- —of 100 lessons read
- —today’s goal: one lesson
You are hereUnit 1: Argument structure and evidential supportContinue this unit
Section 1Tools for clear reasoning
Locked
Unit 2: Conditions, knowledge and ethical interpretation0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Section 2Ethics, mind and critical synthesis
Locked
Unit 3: Ethical approaches, freedom and mind0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Locked
Unit 4: Identity, justice and argument revision0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Section 3Formal reasoning: translating and testing arguments
Locked
Unit 5: Connectives and conditional inference0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Locked
Unit 6: Negation, countermodels and quantifiers0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Section 4Knowledge: luck, reasons and social inquiry
Locked
Unit 7: Justification, defeaters and regress0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Locked
Unit 8: Testimony, disagreement and epistemic audit0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Section 5Philosophy of science: explanation and causal inference
Locked
Unit 9: Testing theories and interpreting models0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Locked
Unit 10: Explanation, causation and research design0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Section 6Normative ethics: principles, objections and public decisions
Locked
Unit 11: Consequences, duties and intended means0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Locked
Unit 12: Responsibility, contractualism and public justification0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Section 7Political philosophy: authority, justice, and justified dissent
Locked
Unit 13: Justifying power among free and equal citizens0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Locked
Unit 14: Distributive justice, structural responsibility, and dissent0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Section 8Epistemology, the self, and the reach of reason: knowledge, mind, freedom, and value
Locked
Unit 15: Knowing, doubting, and being the same self0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Locked
Unit 16: Mind, value, and the discipline of argument0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Section 9Persons, reasons, and legitimate power: consciousness, responsibility, desert, and epistemic justice
Locked
Unit 17: Persons, minds, and the reach of responsibility0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Locked
Unit 18: Desert, testimony, and the limits of legitimate authority0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Section 10Validity, evidence, and fair evaluation: soundness, the fallacies that persuade, and the limits of what an argument can establish
Locked
Unit 19: Validity, soundness, and the fallacies that actually persuade0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
Locked
Unit 20: Evidence, borderline cases, and reconstructing an argument fairly0 of 5 lessons read
Finish Unit 1: Argument structure and evidential support to open this unit.
A fresh start · one small lesson is enough.
0 study interactions · 0 distinct days · 0-day streak · 0/7 recent days
0 / 30 assessments passed · reading is not assessed proficiency.
Continue Philosophy: Arguments and conclusionsLevel 1 · Topic 1 of 10 · Your next unfinished lesson
Expanded instructional sections: 50 / 100 published course lessons. Original explanations elsewhere remain available but are not counted as expanded. Earlier assessment banks reuse lesson questions; appended course levels have separately authored application questions and longer cumulative tests. Extended lessons and book guides retain separate reading sequences; their own multi-unit assessment maps are not yet authored.
Published now: 20 of 100 requested core units. These are grouped into 10 published core levels, not the full requested curriculum or a professional qualification. The remaining units are not published, not hidden behind a paywall or presented as completed work.
Section 1 · FoundationTools for clear reasoning0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 1 · Unit 1
Argument structure and evidential support
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Arguments and conclusions, Validity and truth, Soundness, Induction, Counterexamples. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Arguments and conclusionsStart lesson →Lesson 2
Validity and truthSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
SoundnessSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
InductionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
CounterexamplesSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 1 · Unit 2
Conditions, knowledge and ethical interpretation
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Necessary and sufficient, Knowledge and justification, Skeptical challenges, Ethical reasons, Charitable interpretation. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Necessary and sufficientSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Knowledge and justificationSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Skeptical challengesSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Ethical reasonsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Charitable interpretationSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 1 assessment
10 questions · Not assessed
Section 2 · DevelopmentEthics, mind and critical synthesis0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 2 · Unit 1
Ethical approaches, freedom and mind
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Consequentialist reasoning, Duties and constraints, Virtue and practical wisdom, Freedom and determinism, Mind and explanation. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Consequentialist reasoningSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Duties and constraintsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Virtue and practical wisdomSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Freedom and determinismSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Mind and explanationSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 2 · Unit 2
Identity, justice and argument revision
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Personal identity, Justice and distribution, Bayesian revision in words, Is and ought, Build and revise an argument. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Personal identitySave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Justice and distributionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Bayesian revision in wordsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Is and oughtSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Build and revise an argumentSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 2 assessment
10 questions · Not assessed
Section 3 · IntegrationFormal reasoning: translating and testing arguments0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 3 · Unit 1
Connectives and conditional inference
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Propositions and logical form, Inclusive disjunction, Material implication and its limits, Modus ponens and affirming the consequent, Modus tollens and denying the antecedent. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Propositions and logical formSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Inclusive disjunctionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Material implication and its limitsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Modus ponens and affirming the consequentSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Modus tollens and denying the antecedentSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 3 · Unit 2
Negation, countermodels and quantifiers
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Negating conjunctions and disjunctions, Testing validity with countermodels, Universal and existential quantifiers, Quantifier order and dependency, Negating quantified claims. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Negating conjunctions and disjunctionsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Testing validity with countermodelsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Universal and existential quantifiersSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Quantifier order and dependencySave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Negating quantified claimsSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 3 assessment
10 questions · Not assessed
Section 4 · IntegrationKnowledge: luck, reasons and social inquiry0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 4 · Unit 1
Justification, defeaters and regress
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Gettier cases and epistemic luck, Rebutting and undercutting defeaters, Internalism and externalism about justification, Reliabilism and the generality problem, The regress of reasons. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Gettier cases and epistemic luckSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Rebutting and undercutting defeatersSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Internalism and externalism about justificationSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Reliabilism and the generality problemSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
The regress of reasonsSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 4 · Unit 2
Testimony, disagreement and epistemic audit
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Testimony and responsible reliance, Disagreement between epistemic peers, Epistemic injustice, Contextualism and standards for knowledge, Design an epistemic audit. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Testimony and responsible relianceSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Disagreement between epistemic peersSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Epistemic injusticeSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Contextualism and standards for knowledgeSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Design an epistemic auditSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 4 assessment
10 questions · Not assessed
Section 5 · IntegrationPhilosophy of science: explanation and causal inference0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 5 · Unit 1
Testing theories and interpreting models
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Hume’s problem of induction, Falsifiability and risky prediction, Auxiliary assumptions and theory testing, Underdetermination and model choice, Scientific realism and instrumentalism. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Hume’s problem of inductionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Falsifiability and risky predictionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Auxiliary assumptions and theory testingSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Underdetermination and model choiceSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Scientific realism and instrumentalismSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 5 · Unit 2
Explanation, causation and research design
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Explanation versus prediction, Confounding and causal diagrams, Randomization and its boundaries, Selection and collider bias, Preregistered tests and exploratory discovery. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Explanation versus predictionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Confounding and causal diagramsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Randomization and its boundariesSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Selection and collider biasSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Preregistered tests and exploratory discoverySave the previous lesson to continue
Level 5 assessment
10 questions · Not assessed
Section 6 · IntegrationNormative ethics: principles, objections and public decisions0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 6 · Unit 1
Consequences, duties and intended means
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Act and rule consequentialism, Kantian universalization and maxims, Humanity as an end, Prima facie duties and moral conflict, Double effect and intended means. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Act and rule consequentialismSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Kantian universalization and maximsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Humanity as an endSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Prima facie duties and moral conflictSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Double effect and intended meansSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 6 · Unit 2
Responsibility, contractualism and public justification
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Doing, allowing and negative responsibility, Moral luck and the control condition, Contractualism and reasonable rejection, Reflective equilibrium, Capstone: justify an accessible public service. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Doing, allowing and negative responsibilitySave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Moral luck and the control conditionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Contractualism and reasonable rejectionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Reflective equilibriumSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Capstone: justify an accessible public serviceSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 6 assessment
10 questions · Not assessed
Section 7 · IntegrationPolitical philosophy: authority, justice, and justified dissent0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 7 · Unit 1
Justifying power among free and equal citizens
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Authority is not the same as getting things right, Fair play, public goods, and the unsolicited-benefit objection, Public reason without pretending everyone agrees, The harm principle: necessary condition, not blank permission, Democratic equality and epistemic authority. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Authority is not the same as getting things rightSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Fair play, public goods, and the unsolicited-benefit objectionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Public reason without pretending everyone agreesSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
The harm principle: necessary condition, not blank permissionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Democratic equality and epistemic authoritySave the previous lesson to continue
Level 7 · Unit 2
Distributive justice, structural responsibility, and dissent
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Rawls: fair institutions and the priority of liberty, Nozick: entitlement, voluntary transfer, and historical repair, Capabilities: equal resources, unequal freedom, Structural injustice: tracing interaction without dissolving responsibility, Civil disobedience and a defensible dissent dossier. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Rawls: fair institutions and the priority of libertySave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Nozick: entitlement, voluntary transfer, and historical repairSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Capabilities: equal resources, unequal freedomSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Structural injustice: tracing interaction without dissolving responsibilitySave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Civil disobedience and a defensible dissent dossierSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 7 assessment
12 questions · Not assessed
Section 8 · IntegrationEpistemology, the self, and the reach of reason: knowledge, mind, freedom, and value0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 8 · Unit 1
Knowing, doubting, and being the same self
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Knowledge as justified true belief, and Gettier’s challenge, Justification and the regress of reasons: foundationalism and coherentism, Scepticism and its limits: hyperbolic doubt and the closure argument, Personal identity over time: psychological continuity and its rivals, Free will and determinism: compatibilism, libertarianism, hard determinism. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Knowledge as justified true belief, and Gettier’s challengeSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Justification and the regress of reasons: foundationalism and coherentismSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Scepticism and its limits: hyperbolic doubt and the closure argumentSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Personal identity over time: psychological continuity and its rivalsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Free will and determinism: compatibilism, libertarianism, hard determinismSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 8 · Unit 2
Mind, value, and the discipline of argument
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches The nature of mind: dualism, physicalism, and the explanatory gap, Moral realism versus anti-realism: truth, error, and expression, Justice and political obligation: the particularity problem and philosophical anarchism, Constructing a philosophical argument: premises, validity, and charity, Evaluating arguments: counterexamples, reductio, and the strongest objection. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
The nature of mind: dualism, physicalism, and the explanatory gapSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Moral realism versus anti-realism: truth, error, and expressionSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Justice and political obligation: the particularity problem and philosophical anarchismSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Constructing a philosophical argument: premises, validity, and charitySave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Evaluating arguments: counterexamples, reductio, and the strongest objectionSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 8 assessment
Section 9 · IntegrationPersons, reasons, and legitimate power: consciousness, responsibility, desert, and epistemic justice0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 9 · Unit 1
Persons, minds, and the reach of responsibility
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Narrative identity: is a life story what makes you the same self?, The hard problem of consciousness: statement, challenge, and the illusionist reply, Responsibility as a practice: reactive attitudes, excuses, and standing, Manipulation and personal history: does how you got this way affect what you deserve?, Normative reasons and rationality: internalism, externalism, and the wrong kind of reason. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Narrative identity: is a life story what makes you the same self?Save the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
The hard problem of consciousness: statement, challenge, and the illusionist replySave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Responsibility as a practice: reactive attitudes, excuses, and standingSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Manipulation and personal history: does how you got this way affect what you deserve?Save the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Normative reasons and rationality: internalism, externalism, and the wrong kind of reasonSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 9 · Unit 2
Desert, testimony, and the limits of legitimate authority
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Desert, luck, and equality: does responsibility fix what people are owed?, Epistemic injustice: credibility, interpretation, and whose testimony counts, Legitimacy and the limits of authority: neutrality, judicial review, and where the state stops, Working a genuinely unsettled question: higher-order evidence, defeaters, and reflective equilibrium, Capstone: opaque risk prediction and the limits of state authority. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Desert, luck, and equality: does responsibility fix what people are owed?Save the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Epistemic injustice: credibility, interpretation, and whose testimony countsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Legitimacy and the limits of authority: neutrality, judicial review, and where the state stopsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Working a genuinely unsettled question: higher-order evidence, defeaters, and reflective equilibriumSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Capstone: opaque risk prediction and the limits of state authoritySave the previous lesson to continue
Level 9 assessment
Section 10 · IntegrationValidity, evidence, and fair evaluation: soundness, the fallacies that persuade, and the limits of what an argument can establish0/10 lessons read · 2 units
Level 10 · Unit 1
Validity, soundness, and the fallacies that actually persuade
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches Valid versus sound: the distinction, and how it is used to mislead, The fallacies that are actually common, and the long lists that are not, Thought experiments: what they can and cannot establish, Other minds: what inference from behaviour can and cannot reach, Testimony and trust: is believing what you are told rational by default?. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
Valid versus sound: the distinction, and how it is used to misleadSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
The fallacies that are actually common, and the long lists that are notSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Thought experiments: what they can and cannot establishSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Other minds: what inference from behaviour can and cannot reachSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Testimony and trust: is believing what you are told rational by default?Save the previous lesson to continue
Level 10 · Unit 2
Evidence, borderline cases, and reconstructing an argument fairly
Unit guidebook
Before you begin, this unit teaches The ethics of belief: when is evidence owed, and to whom?, Vagueness, borderline cases, and the sorites paradox, Causation and correlation: what a probabilistic association can and cannot license, Understanding versus prediction: what an explanation adds, Capstone: reconstructing an opponent's argument in its strongest form. The lessons introduce ideas in order, then the unit quiz asks you to retrieve and apply them. You may revisit completed lessons whenever you wish.
Lesson 1
The ethics of belief: when is evidence owed, and to whom?Save the previous lesson to continueLesson 2
Vagueness, borderline cases, and the sorites paradoxSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 3
Causation and correlation: what a probabilistic association can and cannot licenseSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 4
Understanding versus prediction: what an explanation addsSave the previous lesson to continueLesson 5
Capstone: reconstructing an opponent's argument in its strongest formSave the previous lesson to continue
Level 10 assessment
Progress stays in this browser, on this device—not an account or cloud backup. Clearing browser data removes it. Visits never count as study. Previous untimed legacy completions are not invented as study days.
These lessons teach conceptual literacy and careful judgment. They do not establish a professional qualification.